Proximity Bias: Why Proximity Doesn’t Equal Productivity in a Hybrid Workplace

Published on: November 4, 2025
Proximity Bias

The office door closes at 5 PM. Jake gathers his things, exchanges a few laughs with the team lead, and heads home. Across town, Sarah closes her laptop after finishing the same project—two hours ahead of schedule. Both are excellent employees. But when promotion season rolls around, guess who gets the tap on the shoulder?

This isn’t about performance. It’s about proximity bias—and it’s quietly reshaping who gets ahead in today’s hybrid workplace.

What Is Proximity Bias?

Proximity bias is the unconscious tendency to favor employees who are physically present over those who work remotely, regardless of their actual performance or contributions. It’s the modern workplace’s “out of sight, out of mind” problem.

Think of it this way: When your manager sees you in the office every day, you become top-of-mind for exciting projects, spontaneous recognition, and career-advancing opportunities. Remote workers, even those crushing their KPIs, often fade into the background.

The numbers tell a stark story. 96% of executives admit they notice in-office efforts more than remote work, revealing just how deeply ingrained this “seeing is believing” mentality remains in leadership.

By 2025, experts predict that 20% of the U.S. workforce will work remotely. As remote work becomes the norm rather than the exception, proximity bias isn’t just an HR buzzword—it’s a critical challenge that organizations must address to remain competitive and equitable.

The Real Cost of Proximity Bias (It’s Not Just About Feelings)

Proximity bias doesn’t just hurt morale—it hits your bottom line and talent pipeline hard. Here’s what the data reveals:

Career Advancement Takes a Hit

Remote employees are 38% less likely to receive bonuses than on-site workers—a staggering gap that has nothing to do with output. Remote workers get promoted less often than their peers, despite being 15% more productive on average.

Let that sink in. Your most productive employees might be the ones you’re systematically overlooking.

The Visibility Problem Creates Real Consequences

In a recent survey, 42% of managers admitted they sometimes forget about remote workers when assigning tasks. This “forgetting” translates into:

  • Fewer high-profile projects for remote employees
  • Limited access to mentorship and executive visibility
  • Reduced opportunities for spontaneous recognition
  • Lower participation in strategic decision-making

Employee Engagement Plummets

As of 2024, only 30% of U.S. employees report being actively engaged at work, while 62% are not engaged and 15% are actively disengaged. When remote workers feel overlooked, they disengage—creating a vicious cycle where their lack of visibility reinforces the very bias working against them.

Nearly half of remote workers (48%) fear that working remotely means they won’t be heard and that their in-office coworkers will have more opportunities for progress. That fear? It’s justified.

How Proximity Bias Shows Up in Your Workplace

Proximity bias isn’t always obvious. It hides in everyday interactions and decision-making processes. Here are the red flags:

The Informal Advantage

Picture this: Your leadership team grabs coffee together every morning before official work hours. They chat about strategy, swap ideas, and build relationships. Remote employees miss these crucial informal interactions where decisions are shaped and allegiances are formed.

Project Assignment Patterns

When a high-visibility project lands on your desk, who comes to mind first? Often, it’s the person you just saw in a meeting or passed in the hallway—not necessarily the person best suited for the work.

Recognition Discrepancies

In-office employees get spontaneous praise when their manager witnesses their effort firsthand. Remote workers? They need to schedule a meeting to share their wins, which feels like bragging rather than natural recognition.

Meeting Dynamics

Ever been in a hybrid meeting where the conference room erupts in laughter over something the remote attendees didn’t catch? Or where sidebar conversations happen among in-office participants while remote workers sit silently on screen? That’s proximity bias in action.

The Productivity Myth: What Data Actually Reveals

Here’s where things get interesting. The assumption driving proximity bias—that in-office workers are more productive—is flat-out wrong.

Remote Teams Match or Exceed Office Performance

Research paints a completely different picture than the proximity bias narrative suggests:

Stanford economist Nicholas Bloom’s research reinforces this. His study found that hybrid work models—where employees work remotely two days a week—achieve productivity and promotion rates comparable to in-office setups, with a 33% reduction in resignation rates.

Where Time Actually Goes

When we dig into how employees spend their time, the picture becomes clearer:

  • 49% on core work: Direct contributions to key objectives and deliverables
  • 43% on peripheral tasks: Emails, meetings, and administrative work
  • 8% on unproductive time: Distractions, task-switching, and idle time

The real productivity drain? It’s not location—it’s inefficient meetings, unnecessary emails, and unclear priorities that plague both remote and in-office workers alike.

Real-World Example: When Proximity Bias Costs You Top Talent

Let me tell you about Sarah and Jake—two marketing specialists at a mid-sized tech company.

Sarah works remotely from Portland. She consistently delivers campaigns ahead of schedule, her data-driven approach has increased conversion rates by 23%, and she mentors junior team members through Slack and Zoom.

Jake works in the San Francisco office. He’s good at his job, delivers on time, and has solid results. He also grabs lunch with the marketing director twice a week and joins impromptu brainstorming sessions in the conference room.

When a senior leadership position opened, their manager Emily promoted Jake. Her reasoning? “I feel more confident in his abilities because I see him in action every day. I know I can count on him.”

Meanwhile, Sarah’s Excel spreadsheets, documented campaign wins, and measurable impact sit in a shared drive somewhere, unseen and unrewarded.

The Cost: Sarah felt undervalued and accepted a role at a competitor within three months. The company lost a high performer and spent six months and $15,000 recruiting and training her replacement.

The Solution: Emily should have implemented structured performance evaluations based on measurable outcomes, not comfort level. Sarah’s campaign successes should have been showcased in leadership reviews. Both employees deserved equal visibility for their contributions.

How to Dismantle Proximity Bias: Five Strategies That Actually Work

Organizations can’t wish proximity bias away. It requires intentional systems, deliberate processes, and leadership commitment. Here’s how to make it happen:

1. Redesign Performance Evaluations Around Outcomes, Not Optics

Stop rewarding face time. Start rewarding results.

Action steps:

  • Implement OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) tied directly to organizational goals
  • Establish quarterly reviews that assess progress against clear milestones
  • Mandate that all teams adopt standardized evaluation criteria
  • Document achievements in accessible formats that leadership regularly reviews

What success looks like: Performance discussions focus on “What did you achieve?” not “How many hours did I see you working?”

2. Transform Meeting Culture for Hybrid Equity

Meetings are where proximity bias flourishes. Make them fair ground.

Action steps:

  • Rotate meeting facilitators to include remote employees in leadership roles
  • Distribute agendas 24 hours in advance so everyone comes prepared
  • Automatically record meetings and share them for asynchronous review
  • Implement a “camera on” policy for everyone—even in-office attendees joining from their desks

What success looks like: Remote employees participate equally in discussions, and their ideas receive the same consideration as in-office colleagues.

3. Build Asynchronous Workflows Into Your DNA

Not everyone works in the same time zone or has the same peak productivity hours. Embrace it.

Action steps:

  • Use platforms like Notion, Loom, and Slack for project updates that don’t require real-time presence
  • Define response-time expectations (e.g., 24 hours for non-urgent requests)
  • Document decisions in shared spaces where everyone can access them
  • Replace status meetings with written updates that people can review on their schedule

What success looks like: Fewer unnecessary meetings, better documentation, and global team members contributing regardless of their location or time zone.

4. Create Transparent Career Development Pathways

Promotions shouldn’t depend on who had lunch with the CEO last week.

Action steps:

  • Document clear promotion criteria that apply to all employees equally
  • Pair high-potential remote employees with mentors who can advocate for them
  • Conduct quarterly audits of project allocations, leadership opportunities, and promotions to identify patterns
  • Make career development plans visible and actionable, not vague aspirations

What success looks like: Remote and in-office employees advance at similar rates when performance is equivalent. Leadership roles reflect the diversity of your workforce.

5. Train Leaders to Recognize and Combat Unconscious Bias

Proximity bias operates in the shadows. Shine a light on it.

Action steps:

  • Implement mandatory unconscious bias training specifically focused on hybrid team leadership
  • Provide managers with resources and frameworks for equitable decision-making
  • Create accountability through regular check-ins and bias audits
  • Share data on promotion rates, project assignments, and recognition across remote and in-office teams

What success looks like: Leaders actively question their assumptions and create systems that prevent bias before it affects decisions.

The Communication Advantage: Your Secret Weapon Against Proximity Bias

Here’s where theEMPLOYEEapp becomes your competitive advantage in fighting proximity bias.

Traditional communication tools—email, intranet, Slack—create their own proximity problems. Information gets buried, frontline employees miss critical updates, and remote workers feel even more disconnected.

The solution? A communication platform designed for equity:

  • Reach everyone equally: Whether they’re in the office, remote, or on the frontline without email access
  • Ensure message visibility: No more “I didn’t see that email” excuses—everyone gets the same information
  • Create connection: Share wins, recognize achievements, and build culture regardless of physical location
  • Track engagement: Know who’s receiving and reading important information
  • Enable two-way dialogue: Give remote workers a voice in company decisions and discussions

When every employee has equal access to information, recognition, and opportunities to contribute, proximity bias loses its power.

The Bottom Line: Proximity Is Not a Performance Indicator

Let’s be clear: Where someone works doesn’t determine how well they work.

The evidence is overwhelming. Remote workers are more productive, equally innovative, and just as committed as their in-office counterparts. The real question isn’t “Should we trust remote workers?” It’s “Why are we still rewarding physical presence over actual results?”

Proximity bias is a choice—and you can choose differently.

Start today:

  • Audit your last three promotion decisions. Were remote employees considered equally?
  • Review project assignments from the past quarter. Did remote workers get the same opportunities?
  • Ask your remote employees: “Do you feel as visible and valued as your in-office colleagues?”

The answers might surprise you. More importantly, they’ll show you exactly where to start dismantling proximity bias in your organization.

The future of work isn’t about where your employees sit. It’s about creating systems that recognize talent, reward results, and build culture based on outcomes—not optics.

Your best people might not be in the office. Make sure you’re still seeing them.

 

Recommended Resources